etapa 2
21.08.2023
A
THW KIEL –OTP BANK-PICK SZEGED 35–32 (16–15)
Kiel, 5234 spectatori. arbitri: Lah, Sok (slovenia)
KIEL: Mrkva – EKBERG 7 (4), REINKIND 6, ELLEFSEN 4, WIENCEK 4, Johansson 3, Dahmke. rezerve: Bellahcene (p), Duvnjak, Overby 2, Pekeler 3, Gurbindo 3, Wallinius, Ehrig 1, M. Landin 1, Bilyk 1. antrenor: Filip Jicha
SZEGED: Mikler R. –SOSTARIC 8 (1), Garciandia 3, BÁNHIDI 7, Jelinic, Mackovsek 4, BOMBAC 2. rezerve: Imsgard (p), Gaber 2, Martins 2, Frimmel 1 (1), Stepancic 2, Kalaras 1, Bodó. antrenor: Kárpáti Krisztián
scor. 6..: 3–1. 11.: 6–34. 13..: 6–6. 23.: 12–13. 25.: 14–13. 37..: 20–18. 40.: 22–19. 45. : 24–23. 49. : 27–25. 54. : 32–26
minute eliminare: 8, . 10
7 m: 4/4, 3/2
Kolstad –Kielce ( 30–32 (11–17)
PSG –RK Zagreb 35–31 (18–16)
1. Aalborg | 2 | 2 | – | – | 72–54 | +18 | 4 |
2. Kiel | 2 | 2 | – | – | 65–55 | +10 | 4 |
3. PSG | 2 | 2 | – | – | 66–60 | +6 | 4 |
4. Kolstad | 2 | 1 | – | 1 | 61–54 | +7 | 2 |
5. Kielce | 2 | 1 | – | 1 | 63–64 | –1 | 2 |
6. SZEGED | 2 | – | – | 2 | 61–66 | –5 | 0 |
7. Zagreb | 2 | – | – | 2 | 54–65 | –11 | 0 |
8. Peliszter | 2 | – | – | 2 | 45–69 | –24 | 0 |
TELEKOM VESZPRÉM–MONTPELLIER HB 33–31 (13–15)
Veszprém Aréna, 5021 spectatori. arbitri: J. Madsen, H. Mortensen (danemarca)
VESZPRÉM: Corrales – Gasper Marguc 3 (2), Remili 4, Fabregas 3, Ligetvári, EL-DERA 7, MAHÉ 1. rezrtve: BIOSCA (p), Sandell 3, Casado 1, Jahja 1 (1), A. Nilsson 1, VAJLUPAU 6, Koszorotov, Descat, Pesmalbek 3. antrenor: Momir Ilic
MONTPELLIER: Desbonnet 1 – S. KARLSSON 6 (2), Porte, S. Skube, Lenne 1, Moham 4, PELLAS 4. rezerve: Bolzinger (p), KONAN 4, Villeminot 1, Jaime Fernández, Panic 4, Cornette, Monte Dos Santos 2, Berthier, Nacinovic 4. antrenor: Patrice Canayer
scor 5. 2–4. 10.: 4–7. 13.: 7–7. 20. : 10–9. 29.: 10–14. 36.: 16–18. 41.: 18–21. 45..: 23–22. 53..: 29–24. 57.: 32–27
minute eliminare: 6, i 14
7 m: 4/3, 2/2
1. Barca | 2 | 2 | – | – | 62–45 | +17 | 4 |
2. VESZPRÉM | 2 | 2 | – | – | 66–59 | +7 | 4 |
3. GOG | 2 | 2 | – | – | 68–62 | +6 | 4 |
4. Porto | 2 | 2 | – | – | 54–52 | +2 | 4 |
5. Celje | 2 | – | – | 2 | 65–68 | –3 | 0 |
6. Plock | 2 | – | – | 2 | 49–54 | –5 | 0 |
7. Montpellier | 2 | – | – | 2 | 56–63 | –7 | 0 |
8. Magdeburg | 2 | – | – | 2 | 48–65 | –17 | 0 |
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu